Mititelu’s Public Accusations After FCU Craiova’s Exclusion

Across multiple Romanian outlets, Adrian Mititelu delivered a series of explosive, highly confrontational claims following FRF’s decision to exclude FCU Craiova from all competitions. His statements fall into several recurring themes:

1. Accusations Against FRF Leadership

Mititelu repeatedly claimed that the FRF decision was illegitimate and politically motivated.

• He called FRF officials “impostori” who “occupied the federation” and issued a decision with “no legal value”.
• He insisted the exclusion would be challenged in court, framing the ruling as an abuse of power.

2. Claims of a “Criminal Group” Controlling Football

In one of his strongest statements, Mititelu alleged that a “grupare criminală” had taken control of Romanian football institutions and was acting against him and his club.

• He portrayed himself as a target of coordinated institutional hostility.
• This narrative mirrors his long‑standing disputes with federation leadership.

3. Accusations Against the Rival Club (CS Universitatea Craiova)

Mititelu also blamed the rival club in the city for FCU’s downfall.

• He claimed they “created a clone” that stole FCU’s supporters and sponsors.
• He described the situation as “concurență neloială” (unfair competition) and said he “could no longer keep up” because of it.

4. Framing Himself as a Victim of Sabotage

Mititelu’s messaging consistently paints FCU Craiova as a club sabotaged by external forces:

• FRF allegedly targeted him unfairly.
• Local rivals supposedly undermined the club’s financial base.
• Institutional actors were described as hostile or corrupt.

This narrative aligns with his long‑standing public posture in previous disputes.